5g cancer | What does the (WHO) World Health Organization say?

What is 5g  and 5g cancer ?

We need to know all about 5G and 5g cancer. The commercial deployment of 5G is planned for 2020 in Europe. In France, the procedure for allocating the first frequency bands has already been launched. With a speed 50 times faster than 4G. They research also 5g cancer.

This technology will allow, among other things to download movies in the blink of an eye or play video games without latency. It will also carry the promise of a “smart city” where everyday objects communicate with each other. For example autonomous vehicles that react to the millisecond.

However, associations have recently called for a moratorium on 5G: with this technology, the antennas will multiply. And emit powerful radiation which will density the “electromagnetic fog” in which we are already bathed. According to them, this radiation presents real and significant health risks. (Read more about 5g cancer)

The list of which varies according to the whistle blowers: cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, insomnia, reduced immunity or fertility … Is this exposure toxic, or Will it become so by the multiplication of 5G antennas? Is cell phone use dangerous for health? Three experts responded to our call.

3 Questions about the dangers of 5G  5g cancer

  • 5G and health: what are the studies saying?

In 2011, the WHO qualified electromagnetic waves as possibly carcinogenic to humans. But, research has not been able to establish a cause and effect link. In France, an ANSES report seems to exclude any danger of 5G on health. At least in the short term. (Read more about 5g cancer)

  • Does 5G emit more waves than 4G?

5G will mechanically increase the level of exposure to waves. But, for the same amount of data, 5G will emit fewer waves than 4G. And reduce the risks associated with radiation. Because signal processing is different.(Read more about 5g cancer)

  • Are smartphones more dangerous than 5G waves?

In the opinion of many specialists, it is not so much the waves of 5G or 4G that represent a danger to health. But rather the mobile phone. The difference in exposure levels between a mobile telephone. A person and the relay antennas is very high, of the order of a hundred or a thousand times higher for the mobile telephone. (Read more about 5g cancer)

What does the WHO say? 5g cancer

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a specialized agency of the World Health Organization (WHO). Made a classification of carcinogenic agents, probably carcinogenic, possibly carcinogenic, un-classifiable, and not carcinogens.

In this classification, electromagnetic waves are classified in the category of possibly carcinogenic agents for humans. In the same way as engine fumes and fuel oil but also Aloe Vera and vegetables in brine. This category concerns agents for which there is limited or insufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. However, the WHO also specified that “the research could not provide data supporting a relation of cause and effect “. (Read more about 5g cancer)

Clearly, almost 10 years ago, the WHO concluded that the risk exists but that it has not yet been proven. And it is therefore necessary to continue to conduct studies on the subject. Which has not been lacking health security agencies around the world.

5G and health: What the French agencies are saying? 5g cancer

ANSES is the National Agency for Health Security. In France, it is therefore an authority figure. In 2020, it was tasked by the government to “conduct an expertise on the exposure of the population to electromagnetic fields resulting from this technology (5G, Ndr) and to possible health effects “. The eagerly awaited conclusions of this study are intended to be reassuring, at least on the frequencies currently used. (Read more about 5g cancer)

ANSES think through it not likely that the arrangement of 5G in the 3.5. GHz frequency band will present any new health risks. Writes ANSES in its report. And, concerning the other frequencies currently used by 5G, namely the 700 MHz – 2.1 GHz band. ANSES does not issue reservations either. “This band includes frequencies used for a number of an age by the present age group of mobile communique, 2G, 3G and 4G.

Millimetre waves 5g cancer

There remains the 26 GHz band, those of millimetre waves, which will be allocated to 5G, but not before 2023. Regarding them, ANSES is additional alert. ” The records are at the current period, not sufficient for conclude whether or not there are health effects. (Read more about 5g cancer)

” Nevertheless, it sought to assess the probable exposure in the 26 GHz band. Considering a wider frequency band, from 18 to 100 GHz. And this is what ANSES arranges: “The 26 GHz band varies beginning additional frequency bands by a considerable lesser seriousness of infiltration of the waves addicted to the figure of the order of a millimetre. Exposing the superficial layers of the skin. or eye.

In its expert report, the agency nevertheless issues a recommendation. ” As knowledge of the links between exposure and health effects needs to be strengthened. ANSES stresses the need for further research and in particular to monitor the development of the disease. Revelation of people as the amount of projections grows and the usage of networks growths “. (Read more about 5g cancer)

In France, ANSES is not the first official body to conclude that as it stands, 5G does not represent a danger to health. In September 2020, the General Inspectorate of Social Affairs (IGAS) had already submitted a report to the government on the health impact of 5G . He decided that there was “an absenteeism of exact healthiness special effects for 5G “, under the revelation bounds values. The explosion is founded on the discoveries of agencies beginning 22 countries, such as the ANFR in France, which have approved out analyses on the heights of coverage to electromagnetic waves.

What’s wrong with electromagnetic waves? 5g cancer

We use devices that emit or receive radio frequencies on a daily basis. Such as our mobile phones, our internet boxes connected by WiFi. Our Linky meter, or even our good old FM radio for those who still have one. (Read more about 5g cancer)

The problem with these electromagnetic waves is that they don’t detour when you’re on the path. They therefore cross us permanently. That is why they are causing so much concern.

And, it is true that some electromagnetic waves are far from harmless. However, they do not all have the same nuisance power. In fact, their generousness depends on their frequency : the higher the frequency, the more energy the wave carries and the more dangerous it is for 5G, because it is more deeply absorbed by the tissues. (Read more about 5g cancer)

There are two types of waves: ionizing waves and non-ionizing waves. It might infect our nutrients source. Its 5G might also creep up natural world.


5G A Danger For The Planet? 5g cancer

Equally worrying, 5G technology could put the health of our planet at risk. Several studies have shown the harmful effects of radio frequencies on vegetation. American research has proven that the early mortality of Colorado aspen trees was due to radio frequencies that necrotic their leaves. (Read more about 5g cancer)

Another Armenian study has shown that this electromagnetic radiation causes a stress reaction that damages the cells of wheat shoots. Radiation of plants is corrupt newscast intended for the plant life of the planet; then again it is also corrupt news for us:it might infect our nutrients source.`

Yves Le Drean’s opinion

 Certain wavelengths of 5G radiation will be smaller, and therefore more energetic, than those of 4G. This radiation will penetrate less into the tissues. Which will prompt us to examine the potential risk of damage to the skin, nerve endings and the bloodstream. (Read more about 5g cancer)

However, the energy associated with these waves is too low to create cell damage or break the low-energy bonds that hold the molecular assemblies of living things together.

The only proven risk is a risk of overheating but, under our regulations, we are very far from any thermal effects. With 5G we will remain well below the authorized standards, although we can predict that the Internet of Things (the interconnection between the Internet and physical environments) will increase our global exposure. (Read more about 5g cancer)

Biological effects

Studies have suggested other possible biological effects, not thermal ones, but the results obtained are often contradictory, and the lack of reproducible does not allow conclusions to be drawn. (Read more about 5g cancer)

I think that, if these hypothetical effects exist, they are of very small magnitude and do not exceed the capacity of the cells to self-repair! In a somewhat schizophrenic way,

many very connected citizens are at the same time almost ready to believe that the waves of our phones or antennas are deadly! Air pollution is not as serious as air pollution. (Read more about 5g cancer)

It is certainly imperative to monitor the possible long-term risks of exposure to these waves, but, far from demagogic concerns, other proven dangers are linked to the use of the laptop: deaths from road accidents or selfish.

5G might also creep up natural world

According to several reports published over the past two decades, low-intensity microwave radiation is already damaging the health of birds and bees. They chase birds from their nests, causing deterioration of locomotion problems and decreased survival. (Read more about 5g cancer)

Faced with the many health and environmental alerts launched by scientists from all over the planet, uncertainties are growing around 5G and may persist if no precautions are taken before its installation in 2020.

5 Common Health Products You Need Daily

Leave a Comment